Public Notices

Results:
Tag: flood damage reduction
Clear
    • No Items.

ArticleCS

Results:
Tag: flood damage reduction
Clear
  • Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake continues to prevent flood damage

    TULSA — Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, Kan., prevented more than $1.2 million in flood damages in 2010 and more than $59.6 million in flood damages since it was placed in full operation in March 1981.The Corps calculates the flood damage prevented by comparing flood damages that would have occurred if the lake was not in existence and the damage
  • Council Grove Lake continues to prevent flood damage

    TULSA — Council Grove Lake, Kan., prevented more than $3.4 million in flood damages in 2010 and more than $174.3 million in flood damages since it was placed in full operation in October 1964.The Corps calculates the flood damage prevented by comparing flood damages that would have occurred if the lake was not in existence and the damage from
  • El Dorado Lake continues to prevent flood damage

    TULSA — El Dorado Lake, Kan., prevented more than $2.8 million in flood damages in 2010 and more than $285.4 million in flood damages since it was placed in full operation in June 1981. The Corps calculates the flood damage prevented by comparing flood damages that would have occurred if the lake was not in existence and the damage from flooding
  • Elk City Lake continues to prevent flood damage

    TULSA — Elk City Lake, Kan., prevented more than $11.2 million in flood damages in 2010 and more than $465.2 million in flood damages since it was placed in full operation in March 1966.The Corps calculates the flood damage prevented by comparing flood damages that would have occurred if the lake was not in existence and the damage from flooding
  • Fall River Lake continues to prevent flood damage

    TULSA — Fall River Lake, Kan., prevented more than $5.1 million in flood damages in 2010 and more than $475.5 million in flood damages since it was placed in full operation in April 1949. The Corps calculates the flood damage prevented by comparing flood damages that would have occurred if the lake was not in existence and the damage from flooding
  • John Redmond Reservoir continues to prevent flood damage

    TULSA — John Redmond Reservoir, Kan., prevented more than $10.8 million in flood damages in 2010 and more than $739 million in flood damages since it was impounded in September 1964.The Corps calculates the flood damage prevented by comparing flood damages that would have occurred if the lake was not in existence and the damage from flooding since
  • Marion Reservoir continues to prevent flood damage

    TULSA — Marion Reservoir, Kan., prevented almost $6.8 million in flood damages in 2010 and more than $345.9 million in flood damages since it was placed in full operation in February 1968. The Corps calculates the flood damage prevented by comparing flood damages that would have occurred if the lake was not in existence and the damage from flooding
  • Toronto Lake continues to prevent flood damage

    TULSA — Toronto Lake, Kan., prevented more than $7.1 million in flood damages in 2010 and more than $489.5 million in flood damages since it was placed in full operation in March 1960. The Corps calculates the flood damage prevented by comparing flood damages that would have occurred if the lake was not in existence and the damage from flooding
  • Tulsa District lakes in Kansas continue to prevent flood damage

    TULSA — Tulsa District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers lakes in Kansas prevented more than $48.7 million in flood damages in 2010 and more than $3 billion in flood damages since they were placed in full operation.Tulsa District manages eight multi-purpose lakes in southern Kansas. They are John Redmond Reservoir, Marion Reservoir, Council Grove Lake,